|
-
06-13-2011, 08:05 PM
#736
 Originally Posted by Addicted
Now that's curves.
Nice ass, but not really curvy. Britney never really had hips.. even during her prime days. She was all about solid abs and a nice ass with stumpy legs.
She had an amazing body, but it was overrated.
-
06-13-2011, 08:06 PM
#737
Senior Member
Britney spoke about how she listened a lot to Stripped and said she loved the album in that W interview.
superbitch ❤
avatar by jorge.
-
06-13-2011, 08:08 PM
#738
J-lo cover looks so tacky, what are you guys smoking 
-
06-13-2011, 08:08 PM
#739
Originally Posted by VenusAsABoy
lol, this is always an inspiration, stupid magazines and fashion don't have imagination.
puhlease, you know they had to use a big ass computer processor to retouch her pics, big as the ones NASA uses.
banned!
I may do things you don't understand
But remember, I'm only doing the best I can...
-
06-13-2011, 08:09 PM
#740
Originally Posted by Matt
Nice ass, but not really curvy. Britney never really had hips.. even during her prime days. She was all about solid abs and a nice ass with stumpy legs.
She had an amazing body, but it was overrated.
Britney was amazingly toned, had great abs, legs and ass.
But she was framed like a house from the waist up, and moreso today.
-
06-13-2011, 08:10 PM
#741
lol at an arched back = curvy. But I LOVE Britney's shoot
-
06-13-2011, 08:10 PM
#742
Originally Posted by HighHeeledHO
Britney was amazingly toned, had great abs, legs and ass.
But she was framed like a house from the waist up, and moreso today.
I always thought her legs were too short.
I agree with her frame though. It's very masculine, actually.
-
06-13-2011, 08:10 PM
#743
Senior Member
Someone needs to edit the first page.
Photoshop in magazine is absolutely normal! And if there was photoshop involved, it has to be really minimal- I think the photography was awesome- the angle was flattering, the lighting made her look really thin!
-
06-13-2011, 08:11 PM
#744
Originally Posted by Idril
banned!
i'm sure he was being sarcasic with that comment...i hope so!
-
06-13-2011, 08:12 PM
#745
Originally Posted by Bionicken
lol at an arched back = curvy. But I LOVE Britney's shoot
Preach. Britney had a nice toned soccer body of a boy.
"All these ratchet hoes say I ain't sht
Well... least I ain't broke hoe"
-
06-13-2011, 08:12 PM
#746
Originally Posted by Entropy Serpent
Britney spoke about how she listened a lot to Stripped and said she loved the album in that W interview.
Yeah, she tried to do her own with that Mona Lisa album, but her record company said HELL, to the no 
-
06-13-2011, 08:13 PM
#747
Originally Posted by ♫ PABLO
i'm sure he was being sarcasic with that comment...i hope so!
it better be sarcasm!
I may do things you don't understand
But remember, I'm only doing the best I can...
-
06-13-2011, 08:13 PM
#748
Sure, I find Britney's shoot very sexy.
But this is not GQ or KING magazine, this is W.
She's not giving High Fashion, she's not giving couture, as usual, she was selling what Britney sold, Sex. It's not about the garments or an idea, it was about her ass, her tits and her body.
Christina's shoot is high fashion in its entirety. I simply don't see how they can be compared besides the fact that they're in the same magazine.
-
06-13-2011, 08:13 PM
#749
No good scans yet? 
-
06-13-2011, 08:14 PM
#750
Yes Christina has a more feminine body. Britney is more muscular.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
